[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231117112936.GA28997@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 11:29:37 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Enlin Mu <enlin.mu@...look.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, enlin.mu@...soc.com, enlinmu@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove kaslr-seed node when it had used
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 09:55:51PM +0800, Enlin Mu wrote:
> From: Enlin Mu <enlin.mu@...soc.com>
>
> If this node value is zero,it means that kaslr is enabled.
> Removing it for the system safe,nobody knows if this feature is
> enable or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Enlin Mu <enlin.mu@...soc.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/pi/kaslr_early.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pi/kaslr_early.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pi/kaslr_early.c
> index 17bff6e399e4..bc35d4ed84b7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pi/kaslr_early.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pi/kaslr_early.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static u64 get_kaslr_seed(void *fdt)
> return 0;
>
> ret = fdt64_to_cpu(*prop);
> - *prop = 0;
> + fdt_nop_property(fdt, node, "kaslr-seed");
> return ret;
> }
Why is it a problem to know that KASLR is enabled? Wouldn't the presence
of the FDT_NOPs also give a pretty good hint?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists