[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4a129a3-e271-acbb-949c-534a8e1627ee@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 15:32:24 +0200
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kuen-Han Tsai <khtsai@...gle.com>, mathias.nyman@...el.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci: fix null pointer deref for xhci_urb_enqueue
On 17.11.2023 9.21, Kuen-Han Tsai wrote:
> The null pointer dereference happens when xhci_free_dev() frees the
> xhci->devs[slot_id] virtual device while xhci_urb_enqueue() is
> processing a urb and checking the max packet size.
>
> [106913.850735][ T2068] usb 2-1: USB disconnect, device number 2
> [106913.856999][ T4618] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000010
> [106913.857488][ T4618] Call trace:
> [106913.857491][ T4618] xhci_check_maxpacket+0x30/0x2dc
> [106913.857494][ T4618] xhci_urb_enqueue+0x24c/0x47c
> [106913.857498][ T4618] usb_hcd_submit_urb+0x1f4/0xf34
> [106913.857501][ T4618] usb_submit_urb+0x4b8/0x4fc
> [106913.857503][ T4618] usb_control_msg+0x144/0x238
> [106913.857507][ T4618] do_proc_control+0x1f0/0x5bc
> [106913.857509][ T4618] usbdev_ioctl+0xdd8/0x15a8
>
> This patch adds a spinlock to the xhci_urb_enqueue function to make sure
> xhci_free_dev() and xhci_urb_enqueue() do not race and cause null
> pointer dereference.
Thanks, nice catch
This patch does however need some additional tuning
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuen-Han Tsai <khtsai@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> index 884b0898d9c9..e0766ebeff0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> @@ -1522,23 +1522,32 @@ static int xhci_urb_enqueue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, gfp_t mem_flag
> struct urb_priv *urb_priv;
> int num_tds;
>
> - if (!urb)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - ret = xhci_check_args(hcd, urb->dev, urb->ep,
> - true, true, __func__);
> - if (ret <= 0)
> - return ret ? ret : -EINVAL;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&xhci->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (!urb) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto done;
> + }
> +
> + ret = xhci_check_args(hcd, urb->dev, urb->ep, true, true, __func__);
> + if (ret <= 0) {
> + ret = ret ? ret : -EINVAL;
> + goto done;
> + }
>
> slot_id = urb->dev->slot_id;
> ep_index = xhci_get_endpoint_index(&urb->ep->desc);
> ep_state = &xhci->devs[slot_id]->eps[ep_index].ep_state;
>
> - if (!HCD_HW_ACCESSIBLE(hcd))
> - return -ESHUTDOWN;
> + if (!HCD_HW_ACCESSIBLE(hcd)) {
> + ret = -ESHUTDOWN;
> + goto done;
> + }
>
> if (xhci->devs[slot_id]->flags & VDEV_PORT_ERROR) {
> xhci_dbg(xhci, "Can't queue urb, port error, link inactive\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto done;
> }
>
> if (usb_endpoint_xfer_isoc(&urb->ep->desc))
> @@ -1552,8 +1561,10 @@ static int xhci_urb_enqueue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, gfp_t mem_flag
> num_tds = 1;
>
> urb_priv = kzalloc(struct_size(urb_priv, td, num_tds), mem_flags);
kzalloc with spinlock held, should preferably be moved outside lock, otherwise should use GFP_ATOMIC
> - if (!urb_priv)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!urb_priv) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto done;
> + }
>
> urb_priv->num_tds = num_tds;
> urb_priv->num_tds_done = 0;
> @@ -1571,13 +1582,11 @@ static int xhci_urb_enqueue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, gfp_t mem_flag
xhci_check_maxpacket() called here can't be called with spinlock held
> if (ret < 0) {
> xhci_urb_free_priv(urb_priv);
> urb->hcpriv = NULL;
> - return ret;
> + goto done;
Thanks
Mathias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists