[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <864270.1700230337@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:12:17 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>, ying.huang@...el.com,
feng.tang@...el.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [iov_iter] c9eec08bac: vm-scalability.throughput -16.9% regression
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> Hmm, stupid question: are those results better than without that
> oneliner?
Without any changes, I see something like:
iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec: avg 3185 uS, stddev 19 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec: avg 3186 uS, stddev 9 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec: avg 3244 uS, stddev 153 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec_split: avg 3397 uS, stddev 16 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec_split: avg 3400 uS, stddev 16 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec_split: avg 3402 uS, stddev 34 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_kvec: avg 2818 uS, stddev 550 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_kvec: avg 2906 uS, stddev 21 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_kvec: avg 2923 uS, stddev 1496 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray: avg 3564 uS, stddev 6 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray: avg 3573 uS, stddev 17 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray: avg 3575 uS, stddev 58 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray_to_bvec: avg 3929 uS, stddev 9 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray_to_bvec: avg 3930 uS, stddev 6 uS
iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray_to_bvec: avg 3930 uS, stddev 7 uS
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists