[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <602a4845-726d-e034-bd77-20be1ff1d491@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:31:49 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] s390/vfio-ap: a couple of corrections to the IRQ
enablement function
Am 15.11.23 um 15:29 schrieb Alexander Gordeev:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:44:19AM -0500, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> This series corrects two issues related to enablement of interrupts in
>> response to interception of the PQAP(AQIC) command:
> ...
>
> Hi Tony!
>
> Via which tree this series is to be pulled?
>
> Thanks!
I wanted to create a topic repository/branch for s390-specfic vfio code when we expect conflicts or touch kvm or vfio base code.
I started that but I have not finished my preparations.
Given the diffstat:
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
This looks pretty much isolated to s390, so unless Paolo or Alex complain,
we should simply carry that via the s390 tree.
Alexander, can you take those patches?
Tony, I assume none if the patches is urgent and can wait for the next merge window, correct?
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists