[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231117164846.GA10410@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 17:48:46 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu: fix the usage of
read_seqbegin_or_lock()
rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu() should make the "seq" counter odd on the
second pass, otherwise read_seqbegin_or_lock() never takes the lock.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
net/rxrpc/conn_service.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_service.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_service.c
index 89ac05a711a4..39c908a3ca6e 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/conn_service.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_service.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct rxrpc_connection *rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu(struct rxrpc_peer *peer,
struct rxrpc_conn_proto k;
struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp = rxrpc_skb(skb);
struct rb_node *p;
- unsigned int seq = 0;
+ unsigned int seq = 1;
k.epoch = sp->hdr.epoch;
k.cid = sp->hdr.cid & RXRPC_CIDMASK;
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct rxrpc_connection *rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu(struct rxrpc_peer *peer,
* under just the RCU read lock, so we have to check for
* changes.
*/
+ seq++; /* 2 on the 1st/lockless path, otherwise odd */
read_seqbegin_or_lock(&peer->service_conn_lock, &seq);
p = rcu_dereference_raw(peer->service_conns.rb_node);
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
Powered by blists - more mailing lists