[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bza4fejyKRCdcq0WwrvZ-p8JbMq0MPQB_BGzaxPGHT2EoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 12:18:40 -0500
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@...mail.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, andrii@...nel.org, mykolal@...com,
ast@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] selftests/bpf: Update multiple prog_tests to
use ASSERT_ macros
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:14 PM Yuran Pereira
<yuran.pereira@...mail.com> wrote:
>
> Multiple files/programs in `tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/` still
> heavily use the `CHECK` macro, even when better `ASSERT_` alternatives are
> available.
>
> As it was already pointed out by Yonghong Song [1] in the bpf selftests the use
> of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro.
>
> This patchset replaces the usage of `CHECK(` macros to the equivalent `ASSERT_`
> family of macros in the following prog_tests:
> - bind_perm.c
> - bpf_obj_id.c
> - bpf_tcp_ca.c
> - vmlinux.c
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0a142924-633c-44e6-9a92-2dc019656bf2@linux.dev
>
> Yuran Pereira (4):
> Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bpf_tcp_ca
> Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bind_perm
> Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bpf_obj_id
> selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in
> vmlinux
>
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bind_perm.c | 6 +-
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_obj_id.c | 204 +++++++-----------
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 48 ++---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/vmlinux.c | 16 +-
> 4 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
It seems like you introduced a few failures in selftests, please take
a look at [0] and fix them, thanks!
[0] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/6885976657/job/18731029901
Powered by blists - more mailing lists