lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231117145110.235879da@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:51:10 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        peterz@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        paulmck@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        willy@...radead.org, mgorman@...e.de, jon.grimm@....com,
        bharata@....com, raghavendra.kt@....com,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
        jgross@...e.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, mingo@...nel.org,
        bristot@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        geert@...ux-m68k.org, glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de,
        anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com, mattst88@...il.com,
        krypton@...ich-teichert.org, David.Laight@...lab.com,
        richard@....at, mjguzik@...il.com, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 66/86] treewide: kernel: remove cond_resched()

On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 10:14:33 -0800
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:

> Sounds like the sort of test which should be put into linux-next to get
> test coverage right away. To see what really blows up.

No, it shouldn't have been added this early in the development. It depends
on the first part of this patch series, that needs to finished first.

Ankur just gave his full vision of the RFC. You can ignore the removal of
the cond_resched() for the time being.

Thanks for looking at it Luis!

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ