[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec9d03f7-7158-4309-9a04-b08c69b89f39@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:50:56 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc: agross@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, quic_tdas@...cinc.com,
quic_rjendra@...cinc.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
abel.vesa@...aro.org, quic_tsoni@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] clk: qcom: Add Global Clock controller (GCC)
driver for X1E80100
On 17/11/2023 09:27, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> * Use shared ops in the x1e80100 gcc driver [Bryan].
This looks better to me now / more consistent with what we have in
sc8280xp - where we do try to hit suspend and => retention/parking matters.
Could you give a bit more detail on why SDCC* doesn't warrant parking on
X1E80100 as on SC8280XP though ?
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists