[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231118091012.14818-1-bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:40:12 +0530
From: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@...il.com>
To: clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com
Cc: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@...il.com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+d66de4cbf532749df35f@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: ref-verify: fix memory leaks
In btrfs_ref_tree_mod(), when !parent 're' was allocated
through kmalloc(). In the following code, if an error occurs,
the execution will be redirected to 'out' or 'out_unlock' and
the function will be exited. However, on some of the paths,
're' are not deallocated and may lead to memory leaks.
For example : lookup_block_entry() for 'be' returns null, the
out label will be invoked. During that flow ref and ra was
freed but not re, which can potentially lead to memleak
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+d66de4cbf532749df35f@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d66de4cbf532749df35f
Signed-off-by: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@...il.com>
---
V1 -> V2: 're' shouldn't be freed after it added to rbtree
fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c b/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c
index 1f62976bee82..6486f0d7e993 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c
@@ -794,6 +794,7 @@ int btrfs_ref_tree_mod(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
dump_ref_action(fs_info, ra);
kfree(ref);
kfree(ra);
+ kfree(re);
goto out_unlock;
} else if (be->num_refs == 0) {
btrfs_err(fs_info,
@@ -803,6 +804,7 @@ int btrfs_ref_tree_mod(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
dump_ref_action(fs_info, ra);
kfree(ref);
kfree(ra);
+ kfree(re);
goto out_unlock;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists