[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZVoMklvIVClr_IIH@archie.me>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2023 20:24:34 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: Phillip Susi <phill@...susis.net>,
Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Linux DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux AMDGPU <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Radeon regression in 6.6 kernel
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 04:47:01PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > On 12.11.23 01:46, Phillip Susi wrote:
> > > I had been testing some things on a post 6.6-rc5 kernel for a week or
> > > two and then when I pulled to a post 6.6 release kernel, I found that
> > > system suspend was broken. It seems that the radeon driver failed to
> > > suspend, leaving the display dead, the wayland display server hung, and
> > > the system still running. I have been trying to bisect it for the last
> > > few days and have only been able to narrow it down to the following 3
> > > commits:
> > >
> > > There are only 'skip'ped commits left to test.
> > > The first bad commit could be any of:
> > > 56e449603f0ac580700621a356d35d5716a62ce5
> > > c07bf1636f0005f9eb7956404490672286ea59d3
> > > b70438004a14f4d0f9890b3297cd66248728546c
> > > We cannot bisect more!
> >
> > Hmm, not a single reply from the amdgpu folks. Wondering how we can
> > encourage them to look into this.
> >
> > Phillip, reporting issues by mail should still work, but you might have
> > more luck here, as that's where the amdgpu afaics prefer to track bugs:
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues
> >
> > When you file an issue there, please mention it here.
> >
> > Furthermore it might help if you could verify if 6.7-rc1 (or rc2, which
> > comes out later today) or 6.6.2-rc1 improve things.
>
> It would also be good to test if reverting any of these is possible or not.
>
Hi Dave,
AFAIK commit c07bf1636f0005 ("MAINTAINERS: Update the GPU Scheduler email")
doesn't seem to do with this regression as it doesn't change any amdgpu code
that may introduce the regression.
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists