linux-kernel - Re: Radeon regression in 6.6 kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <af2d08ab-54c3-4066-9c28-18e96de8643a@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 19 Nov 2023 20:53:33 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc:     Phillip Susi <phill@...susis.net>,
        Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Linux DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux AMDGPU <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Radeon regression in 6.6 kernel

On 11/19/23 20:48, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> On 19.11.23 14:24, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> AFAIK commit c07bf1636f0005 ("MAINTAINERS: Update the GPU Scheduler email")
>> doesn't seem to do with this regression as it doesn't change any amdgpu code
>> that may introduce the regression.
> 
> Bagas, sorry for being blunt here, I know you mean well. But I feel the
> need to say the following in the open, as this otherwise falls back on
> me and regression tracking.
> 
> Stating the above is not very helpful, as Dave for sure will know.
> Telling Phillip that he likely can skip that commit might have been
> something different. But I guess even for most users that are able to do
> a bisection it's obvious and maybe not worth pointing out.
> 

I was scratching my itch then when replying. Thanks anyway.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara