[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5adae6067e0d05a4421616f9153bc865cd200a15.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2023 19:33:11 +0200
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] KVM: x86: Drop unnecessary check that
cpuid_entry2_find() returns right leaf
On Fri, 2023-11-10 at 15:55 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Drop an unnecessary check that cpuid_entry2_find() returns the correct
> leaf when getting CPUID.0x7.0x0 to update X86_FEATURE_OSPKE, as
> cpuid_entry2_find() never returns an entry for the wrong function. And
> not that it matters, but cpuid_entry2_find() will always return a precise
> match for CPUID.0x7.0x0 since the index is significant.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index 6777780be6ae..36bd04030989 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static void __kvm_update_cpuid_runtime(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_cpuid_e
> }
>
> best = cpuid_entry2_find(entries, nent, 7, 0);
> - if (best && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PKU) && best->function == 0x7)
> + if (best && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PKU))
> cpuid_entry_change(best, X86_FEATURE_OSPKE,
> kvm_is_cr4_bit_set(vcpu, X86_CR4_PKE));
>
Makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
Powered by blists - more mailing lists