linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: usb: ti,j721e-usb: add ti,j7200-usb compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f0da181-717c-4b14-ba3f-d287efe4105b@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:32:07 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
        Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>,
        Pawel Laszczak <pawell@...ence.com>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Grégory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: usb: ti,j721e-usb: add ti,j7200-usb
 compatible

On 20/11/2023 18:06, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> On this platform, the controller & its wrapper are reset on resume. This
> makes it have a different behavior from other platforms.
> 
> We allow using the new compatible with a fallback onto the original
> ti,j721e-usb compatible. We therefore allow using an older kernel with

Where is fallback ti,j721e-usb used? Please point me to the code.


> a more recent devicetree.
> 
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,j721e-usb.yaml | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,j721e-usb.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,j721e-usb.yaml
> index 95ff9791baea..69a222dfd9ff 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,j721e-usb.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,j721e-usb.yaml
> @@ -12,11 +12,15 @@ maintainers:
>  properties:
>    compatible:
>      oneOf:
> +      - const: ti,j7200-usb
>        - const: ti,j721e-usb
>        - const: ti,am64-usb
>        - items:
>            - const: ti,j721e-usb
>            - const: ti,am64-usb
> +      - items:
> +          - const: ti,j721e-usb

This makes little sense. It's already on the list. Twice! Don't add it
third time.

I am sorry, but this binding makes no sense. I mean, existing binding
makes no sense, but your change is not making it anyhow better.

Best regards,
Krzysztof