linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] loongarch: add dependency between vmlinuz.efi and vmlinux.efi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H7GiQ=+kU9xH09pL89QYSKOhBEcT5L55wPhXuoDkL37Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2023 14:13:13 +0800
From:   Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc:     WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loongarch: add dependency between vmlinuz.efi and vmlinux.efi

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 12:45 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 10:33 AM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Masahiro,
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 10:25 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 8:59 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi, Masahiro,
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 1:35 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > A common issue in Makefile is a race in parallel building.
> > > > >
> > > > > You need to be careful to prevent multiple threads from writing to the
> > > > > same file simultaneously.
> > > > >
> > > > > Commit 3939f3345050 ("ARM: 8418/1: add boot image dependencies to not
> > > > > generate invalid images") addressed such a bad scenario.
> > > > >
> > > > > A similar symptom occurs with the following command:
> > > > >
> > > > >   $ make -j$(nproc) ARCH=loongarch vmlinux.efi vmlinuz.efi
> > > > >     [ snip ]
> > > > >     SORTTAB vmlinux
> > > > >     OBJCOPY arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinux.efi
> > > > >     OBJCOPY arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinux.efi
> > > > >     PAD     arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinux.bin
> > > > >     GZIP    arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinuz
> > > > >     OBJCOPY arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinuz.o
> > > > >     LD      arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinuz.efi.elf
> > > > >     OBJCOPY arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinuz.efi
> > > > >
> > > > > The log "OBJCOPY arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinux.efi" is displayed twice.
> > > > >
> > > > > It indicates that two threads simultaneously enter arch/loongarch/boot/
> > > > > and write to arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinux.efi.
> > > > >
> > > > > It occasionally leads to a build failure:
> > > > >
> > > > >   $ make -j$(nproc) ARCH=loongarch vmlinux.efi vmlinuz.efi
> > > > >     [ snip ]
> > > > >     SORTTAB vmlinux
> > > > >     OBJCOPY arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinux.efi
> > > > >     PAD     arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinux.bin
> > > > >   truncate: Invalid number: ‘arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinux.bin’
> > > > >   make[2]: *** [drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile.zboot:13:
> > > > >   arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinux.bin] Error 1
> > > > >   make[2]: *** Deleting file 'arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinux.bin'
> > > > >   make[1]: *** [arch/loongarch/Makefile:146: vmlinuz.efi] Error 2
> > > > >   make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > > > >   make: *** [Makefile:234: __sub-make] Error 2
> > > > >
> > > > > vmlinuz.efi depends on vmlinux.efi, but such a dependency is not
> > > > > specified in arch/loongarch/Makefile.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > >  arch/loongarch/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/Makefile b/arch/loongarch/Makefile
> > > > > index 9eeb0c05f3f4..6022bf3d30c9 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/loongarch/Makefile
> > > > > +++ b/arch/loongarch/Makefile
> > > > > @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ vdso-install-y += arch/loongarch/vdso/vdso.so.dbg
> > > > >
> > > > >  all:   $(notdir $(KBUILD_IMAGE))
> > > > >
> > > > > +vmlinuz.efi: vmlinux.efi
> > > > >  vmlinux.elf vmlinux.efi vmlinuz.efi: vmlinux
> > > > >         $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) $(bootvars-y) $(boot)/$@
> > > > It is a little strange, because
> > > >
> > > > in drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile.zboot:
> > > > vmlinuz.efi depends on vmlinuz.efi.elf, vmlinuz.efi.elf depends on
> > > > vmlinuz.o, vmlinuz.o depends on vmlinuz, vmlinuz depends on
> > > > vmlinux.bin, vmlinux.bin depends on $(EFI_ZBOOT_PAYLOAD).
> > > >
> > > > in arch/loongarch/boot/Makefile,
> > > > EFI_ZBOOT_PAYLOAD := vmlinux.efi
> > > >
> > > > So I think vmlinuz.efi has already depend on vmlinux.efi.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > That is a story in arch/loongarch/boot/Makefile.
> > >
> > >
> > > I am talking about arch/loongarch/Makefile,
> > > which is included from the top Makefile.
> > >
> > >
> > > See this code.
> > >
> > >
> > > vmlinux.elf vmlinux.efi vmlinuz.efi: vmlinux
> > >         $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) $(bootvars-y) $(boot)/$@
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Only the required dependency is
> > >
> > >  - vmlinux.elf depends on vmlinux
> > >  - vmlinuz.elf depends on vmlinux
> > >
> > >
> > > vmlinux.elf and vmlinuz.elf are independent of each other.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In parallel building, GNU Make considers that
> > > vmlinux.elf and vmlinuz.elf can be built simultaneously.
> > >
> > >
> > > GNU Make spawns two processes to execute these simultaneously:
> > >
> > >  $(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) $(bootvars-y) $(boot)/vmlinux.elf
> > >  $(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) $(bootvars-y) $(boot)/vmlinuz.elf
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The former enters arch/loongarch/boot/Makefile to build
> > > vmlinux.elf.  (A)
> > >
> > >
> > > The latter also enters arch/loongarch/boot/Makefile to build
> > > vmlinuz.elf, which depends on vmlinux.elf  (B)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > (A) and (B) are independent processes, hence none of them
> > > know the other.
> > >
> > >
> > > I hope it is clearer.
> > Sorry, I'm not familiar with Makefile rules, so you are probably
> > right, but should we do it like this (remove the direct dependency
> > from vmlinuz.efi to vmlinux)?
> >
> > vmlinuz.efi: vmlinux.efi
> > vmlinux.elf vmlinux.efi: vmlinux
> >         $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) $(bootvars-y) $(boot)/$@
>
>
>
> No.
>
> It would create only vmlinux.efi because there is
> no recipe line for vmlinuz.efi
>
>
>
>
> vmlinuz.efi: vmlinux.efi
>         $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) $(bootvars-y) $(boot)/$@
> vmlinux.elf vmlinux.efi: vmlinux
>         $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) $(bootvars-y) $(boot)/$@
>
>
> will work, but I do not want to repeat the same recipe line.
>
OK, I know, thank you very much. This patch will be applied to loongarch-fixes.

Huacai

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Huacai
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Huacai
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.40.1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards
> > > Masahiro Yamada
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada