linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] jump_label,module: Don't alloc static_key_mod for __ro_after

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202311210541.RAdnu4yL-lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2023 05:38:03 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc:     oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        "ndesaulniers@...gle.com" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] jump_label,module: Don't alloc static_key_mod for
 __ro_after_init keys

Hi Valentin,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/core]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.7-rc2 next-20231120]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Valentin-Schneider/jump_label-module-Don-t-alloc-static_key_mod-for-__ro_after_init-keys/20231120-190044
base:   tip/x86/core
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120105528.760306-2-vschneid%40redhat.com
patch subject: [PATCH 1/5] jump_label,module: Don't alloc static_key_mod for __ro_after_init keys
config: s390-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231121/202311210541.RAdnu4yL-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231121/202311210541.RAdnu4yL-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311210541.RAdnu4yL-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   init/main.c: In function 'mark_readonly':
>> init/main.c:1406:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'jump_label_ro'; did you mean 'jump_label_lock'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    1406 |                 jump_label_ro();
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                 jump_label_lock
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +1406 init/main.c

  1394	
  1395	#ifdef CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
  1396	static void mark_readonly(void)
  1397	{
  1398		if (rodata_enabled) {
  1399			/*
  1400			 * load_module() results in W+X mappings, which are cleaned
  1401			 * up with call_rcu().  Let's make sure that queued work is
  1402			 * flushed so that we don't hit false positives looking for
  1403			 * insecure pages which are W+X.
  1404			 */
  1405			rcu_barrier();
> 1406			jump_label_ro();
  1407			mark_rodata_ro();
  1408			rodata_test();
  1409		} else
  1410			pr_info("Kernel memory protection disabled.\n");
  1411	}
  1412	#elif defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX)
  1413	static inline void mark_readonly(void)
  1414	{
  1415		pr_warn("Kernel memory protection not selected by kernel config.\n");
  1416	}
  1417	#else
  1418	static inline void mark_readonly(void)
  1419	{
  1420		pr_warn("This architecture does not have kernel memory protection.\n");
  1421	}
  1422	#endif
  1423	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki