[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231120214742.GC8262@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 22:47:42 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@...icios.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] tracing: Introduce faultable tracepoints
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 03:54:14PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> When invoked from system call enter/exit instrumentation, accessing
> user-space data is a common use-case for tracers. However, tracepoints
> currently disable preemption around iteration on the registered
> tracepoint probes and invocation of the probe callbacks, which prevents
> tracers from handling page faults.
>
> Extend the tracepoint and trace event APIs to allow defining a faultable
> tracepoint which invokes its callback with preemption enabled.
>
> Also extend the tracepoint API to allow tracers to request specific
> probes to be connected to those faultable tracepoints. When the
> TRACEPOINT_MAY_FAULT flag is provided on registration, the probe
> callback will be called with preemption enabled, and is allowed to take
> page faults. Faultable probes can only be registered on faultable
> tracepoints and non-faultable probes on non-faultable tracepoints.
>
> The tasks trace rcu mechanism is used to synchronize read-side
> marshalling of the registered probes with respect to faultable probes
> unregistration and teardown.
What is trace-trace rcu and why is it needed here? What's wrong with
SRCU ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists