[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA1PR11MB6734CCE019A5BFC5BF8CF6F3A8B4A@SA1PR11MB6734.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 08:16:48 +0000
From: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
To: "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>
CC: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"Cui, Dexuan" <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 12/23] KVM: VMX: Handle FRED event data
> >> IIUC, L1 KVM can inject a nested exception whose vector isn't #DB, or
> >> #NM or #PF with a non-zero event_data to L2.
> >
> >No, this is not allowed.
>
> How do you interpret the last sentence:
>
> Section 5.2.1 specifies the event data that FRED event delivery of
> certain events saves on the stack. When FRED event delivery is used
> for an event injected by VM entry, the event data saved is the value
> of the injected-event-data field in the VMCS. This value is used
> instead of what is specified in Section 5.2.1 and is done for __ALL__
> injected events using FRED event delivery
To me, it means FRED event injection during VM entry simply pushes the
value in the injected-event-data field of the VMCS as event data. But
the event data definition should comply with Section 5.2.1. It is a
forward compatibility issue otherwise.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists