linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v6 2/6] iommufd: Add IOMMU_HWPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB527659462CCB7280055858D98CB4A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2023 08:34:58 +0000
From:   "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To:     "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
        "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
        "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
        "baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        "eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        "nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
        "yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
        "peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
        "jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com" 
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
        "lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
        "suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@...el.com>,
        "joao.m.martins@...cle.com" <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
        "Zeng, Xin" <xin.zeng@...el.com>,
        "Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 2/6] iommufd: Add IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE

> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 4:30 PM
> 
> On 2023/11/20 16:09, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> >> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 9:07 PM
> >> + * @req_len: Length (in bytes) of a request entry in the request array
> >> + * @req_num: Input the number of cache invalidation requests in the
> array.
> >> + *           Output the number of requests successfully handled by kernel.
> >> + * @out_driver_error_code: Report a driver speicifc error code upon
> failure.
> >> + *                         It's optional, driver has a choice to fill it or
> >> + *                         not.
> >
> > Being optional how does the user tell whether the code is filled or not?
> 
> seems like we need a flag for it. otherwise, a reserved special value is
> required. or is it enough to just document it that this field is available
> or not per the iommu_hw_info_type?
> 

No guarantee that a reserved special value applies to all vendors.

I'll just remove the optional part. the viommu driver knows what a valid
code is, if the driver fills it.