[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20e6c1dd-a195-4b49-8723-7c94f7562b4c@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:56:18 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/memory_hotplug: add missing mem_hotplug_lock
On 20.11.23 08:23, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
> From Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst:
> When adding/removing/onlining/offlining memory or adding/removing
> heterogeneous/device memory, we should always hold the mem_hotplug_lock
> in write mode to serialise memory hotplug (e.g. access to global/zone
> variables).
>
> mhp_(de)init_memmap_on_memory() functions can change zone stats and
> struct page content, but they are currently called w/o the
> mem_hotplug_lock.
>
> When memory block is being offlined and when kmemleak goes through each
> populated zone, the following theoretical race conditions could occur:
> CPU 0: | CPU 1:
> memory_offline() |
> -> offline_pages() |
> -> mem_hotplug_begin() |
> ... |
> -> mem_hotplug_done() |
> | kmemleak_scan()
> | -> get_online_mems()
> | ...
> -> mhp_deinit_memmap_on_memory() |
> [not protected by mem_hotplug_begin/done()]|
> Marks memory section as offline, | Retrieves zone_start_pfn
> poisons vmemmap struct pages and updates | and struct page members.
> the zone related data |
> | ...
> | -> put_online_mems()
>
> Fix this by ensuring mem_hotplug_lock is taken before performing
> mhp_init_memmap_on_memory(). Also ensure that
> mhp_deinit_memmap_on_memory() holds the lock.
>
> online/offline_pages() are currently only called from
> memory_block_online/offline(), so it is safe to move the locking there.
>
> Fixes: a08a2ae34613 ("mm,memory_hotplug: allocate memmap from the added memory range")
> Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists