linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] indirect_call_wrapper: Fix typo in INDIRECT_CALL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231120092414.GJ186930@vergenet.net>
Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:24:14 +0000
From:   Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] indirect_call_wrapper: Fix typo in
 INDIRECT_CALL_$NR kerneldoc

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 01:03:10AM -0500, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 17:56:26 +0000 Simon Horman wrote:
> > To the netdev maintainers: get_maintainer.pl doesn't seem to
> > know much about include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h.
> > Should that be fixed?
> 
> I'm curious how many of such files exist under include/linux.
> Files which are not really networking specific but only tree
> the changes ever went thru is netdev.. 
> But yes, in the interest of "taking responsibility" we should
> probably claim it.

Thanks, patch sent.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231120-indirect_call_wrapper-maintainer-v1-1-0a6bb1f7363e@kernel.org/