[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZVspV8zMMFPQxRaG@li-2b55cdcc-350b-11b2-a85c-a78bff51fc11.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 10:39:35 +0100
From: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: use vmem_altmap code without CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 10:01:13AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> What speaks against just moving them to the header instead? They surely are
> tiny ...
>
I followed the previous convention. Sure, will make it inline and put
those definitions in header file.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists