linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm:zswap: fix zswap entry reclamation failure in two scenarios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8734x1cdtr.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:18:24 +0800
From:   "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:     Chris Li <chriscli@...gle.com>
Cc:     Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
        Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@...edance.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
        Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
        Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
        Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.com>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm:zswap: fix zswap entry reclamation failure in two
 scenarios

Chris Li <chriscli@...gle.com> writes:

> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:19 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Not bypassing the swap slot cache, just make the callbacks to
>> invalidate the zswap entry, do memg uncharging, etc when the slot is
>> no longer used and is entering the swap slot cache (i.e. when
>> free_swap_slot() is called), instead of when draining the swap slot
>> cache (i.e. when swap_range_free() is called). For all parts of MM
>> outside of swap, the swap entry is freed when free_swap_slot() is
>> called. We don't free it immediately because of caching, but this
>> should be transparent to other parts of MM (e.g. zswap, memcg, etc).
>
> That will cancel the batching effect on the swap slot free, making the
> common case for  swapping  faults take longer to complete, righ?
> If I recall correctly, the uncharge is the expensive part of the swap
> slot free operation.
> I just want to figure out what we are trading off against. This is not
> one side wins all situations.

Per my understanding, we don't batch memcg uncharging in
swap_entry_free() now.  Although it's possible and may improve
performance.

--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying