[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231120115233.GT8262@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 12:52:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@...cle.com>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] locking: Add rwsem_assert_held() and
rwsem_assert_held_write()
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 02:51:39PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> Modelled after lockdep_assert_held() and lockdep_assert_held_write(),
> but are always active, even when lockdep is disabled. Of course, they
> don't test that _this_ thread is the owner, but it's sufficient to catch
> many bugs and doesn't incur the same performance penalty as lockdep.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists