[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <456145f7-9c6e-4231-aec4-9c02511b6550@suswa.mountain>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 07:31:10 -0500
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
Cc: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>,
"Jes.Sorensen@...il.com" <Jes.Sorensen@...il.com>,
"kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: correct the error value of 'timeout'
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 06:42:50AM +0000, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> > index 43ee7592bc6e..9cab8b1dc486 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> > @@ -4757,6 +4757,12 @@ void rtl8xxxu_gen1_init_aggregation(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv)
> > * RxAggPageTimeout = 4 or 6 (absolute time 34ms/(2^6))
> > */
> >
> > + /* REG_RXDMA_AGG_PG_TH + 1 seems to be the timeout register on
> > + * gen2 chips and rtl8188eu. The rtl8723au seems unhappy if we
> > + * don't set it, so better set both.
> > + */
> > + timeout = 4;
> > +
> > page_thresh = (priv->fops->rx_agg_buf_size / 512);
> > if (rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages >= 0) {
> > if (rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages <= page_thresh)
>
> The logic here is:
>
> page_thresh = (priv->fops->rx_agg_buf_size / 512);
> if (rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages >= 0) {
> if (rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages <= page_thresh)
> timeout = page_thresh;
>
> Do you know why 'timeout = page_thresh;'? Intuitively, units of 'timeout' and
> 'thresh' are different. Maybe, we should correct here instead?
>
Yeah. That's strange. I'm not convinced this fix is correct. I'm
hesitant to suggest this but maybe the following is the correct fix?
It just silences the warning but doesn't change runtime.
I don't know. *shrug*. One thing that we could do is just leave the
warning as-is until someone who knows better than we do can take a look
at it.
regards,
dan carpenter
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
index 43ee7592bc6e..68d9b4a0ee63 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
@@ -4759,16 +4759,16 @@ void rtl8xxxu_gen1_init_aggregation(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv)
page_thresh = (priv->fops->rx_agg_buf_size / 512);
if (rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages >= 0) {
- if (rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages <= page_thresh)
- timeout = page_thresh;
- else if (rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages <= 6)
- dev_err(&priv->udev->dev,
- "%s: dma_agg_pages=%i too small, minimum is 6\n",
- __func__, rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages);
- else
- dev_err(&priv->udev->dev,
- "%s: dma_agg_pages=%i larger than limit %i\n",
- __func__, rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages, page_thresh);
+ if (rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages > page_thresh) {
+ if (rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages <= 6)
+ dev_err(&priv->udev->dev,
+ "%s: dma_agg_pages=%i too small, minimum is 6\n",
+ __func__, rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages);
+ else
+ dev_err(&priv->udev->dev,
+ "%s: dma_agg_pages=%i larger than limit %i\n",
+ __func__, rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages, page_thresh);
+ }
}
rtl8xxxu_write8(priv, REG_RXDMA_AGG_PG_TH, page_thresh);
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists