linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] mm/compaction: enable compacting >0 order folios.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <300AECEE-2B86-4124-8571-E74E97988C50@nvidia.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:05:59 -0500
From:   Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "\"Huang, Ying\"" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "\"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)\"" <willy@...radead.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        "\"Yin, Fengwei\"" <fengwei.yin@...el.com>,
        Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "\"Kirill A . Shutemov\"" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Rohan Puri <rohan.puri15@...il.com>,
        Mcgrof Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@...sung.com>,
        "\"Vishal Moola (Oracle)\"" <vishal.moola@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] mm/compaction: enable compacting >0 order folios.

>> @@ -1144,17 +1166,18 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
>>   					goto isolate_abort;
>>   				}
>>   			}
>> +		}
>>  -			/*
>> -			 * folio become large since the non-locked check,
>> -			 * and it's on LRU.
>> -			 */
>> -			if (unlikely(folio_test_large(folio) && !cc->alloc_contig)) {
>> -				low_pfn += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
>> -				nr_scanned += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
>> -				folio_set_lru(folio);
>> -				goto isolate_fail_put;
>> -			}
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Check LRU folio order under the lock
>> +		 */
>> +		if (unlikely(skip_isolation_on_order(folio_order(folio),
>> +						     cc->order) &&
>> +			     !cc->alloc_contig)) {
>> +			low_pfn += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
>> +			nr_scanned += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
>> +			folio_set_lru(folio);
>> +			goto isolate_fail_put;
>>   		}
>
> Why was this part moved out of the 'if (lruvec != locked)' block? If we hold the lru lock, then we do not need to check again, right?

Probably I messed this up during rebase. Thank you for pointing this out.
Will fix it in the next version.

--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (855 bytes)