linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] x86/bpf: Fix FineIBT vs eBPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231120144642.591358648@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2023 15:46:42 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
        haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        samitolvanen@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org, nathan@...nel.org,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, jpoimboe@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com,
        mark.rutland@....com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] x86/bpf: Fix FineIBT vs eBPF

Hi!

There's a problem with FineIBT and eBPF using __nocfi when
CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=n, in which case the __nocfi indirect call can target
a normal function like __bpf_prog_run32().

Specifically the various preambles look like:

   FineIBT				JIT

   __cfi_foo:
      endbr64
      subl	$hash, %r10d
      jz	1f
      ud2
   1: nop
   foo:					foo:
      osp nop3				   endbr64
      ...				   ...

So while bpf_dispatcher_*_func() does a __nocfi call to foo()+0 and this
matches what the JIT generates, it does not work for regular FineIBT functions,
since their +0 endbr got poisoned and things go *boom*.

Cure this by teaching the BPF JIT about all the various CFI forms. Notably this
removes the last __nocfi call on x86.

If the BPF folks agree (and the robots don't find fail) I'd like to take this
through the x86 tree, because I have a few more patches that turn the non-fatal
'osp nop3' poison into a 4 byte ud1 instruction which is rather fatal. As a
result this problem will also surface on !IBT hardware.