[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231120155936.GY8262@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:59:36 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org, nathan@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, jpoimboe@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com,
mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cfi,bpf: Fix BPF JIT call
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 03:46:44PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> @@ -2935,9 +3009,9 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(str
> jit_data->header = header;
> jit_data->rw_header = rw_header;
> }
> - prog->bpf_func = (void *)image;
> + prog->bpf_func = (void *)image + ctx.prog_offset;
> prog->jited = 1;
> - prog->jited_len = proglen;
> + prog->jited_len = proglen - ctx.prog_offset; // XXX?
> } else {
> prog = orig_prog;
> }
Note the XXX there, I wasn't sure what the desired semantics of proglen
was. As implemented it is the length from where bpf_func points to the
end, not including the pre-preamble -- as indicated by offset.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists