[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f7747d2-f2ee-4e3e-be70-231673365339@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:11:05 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc: "dietmar.eggemann@....com" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Szabolcs.Nagy@....com" <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"debug@...osinc.com" <debug@...osinc.com>,
"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"fweimer@...hat.com" <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hjl.tools@...il.com" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"vschneid@...hat.com" <vschneid@...hat.com>,
"brauner@...nel.org" <brauner@...nel.org>,
"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"bristot@...hat.com" <bristot@...hat.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"bsegall@...gle.com" <bsegall@...gle.com>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"Pandey, Sunil K" <sunil.k.pandey@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"juri.lelli@...hat.com" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC RFT v2 2/5] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 05:43:26PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> Either of those seem fine to me, but it would be nice to get it vetted
> by the libc folks before committing. I'd maybe lean towards the one you
> suggested without the new flag.
I'll go with just taking the stack size as a parameter then, less
validation, hopefully the userspace people will be OK with that - I
agree it'd be best to get their buy in.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists