[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <314e596f4f7b7e7f8742c47dfeeb7d93@mail.infomaniak.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 17:45:29 +0100
From: linux@...ler.io
To: Stefan Moring <stefan.moring@...hnolution.nl>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: spi: imx: Increase imx51 ecspi burst length fails on imx6dl and
imx8mm
Hi Stefan
I added my printing
@@ -655,12 +658,25 @@ static int mx51_ecspi_prepare_transfer(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx,
/* Clear BL field and set the right value */
ctrl &= ~MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_BL_MASK;
+ dev_info(spi_imx->dev, "%s: count=%d, bits_per_word=%d\n",
+ __FUNCTION__, spi_imx->count, spi_imx->bits_per_word);
+
if (spi_imx->target_mode && is_imx53_ecspi(spi_imx))
ctrl |= (spi_imx->target_burst * 8 - 1)
<< MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_BL_OFFSET;
and run the test with the burst enabled
/var/volatile/tmp# spidev_test --device /dev/spidev1.0 --speed 20000000 --bpw 8 -i 127bytes-spi-test-data.bin -o 127bytes-spi-test-result.bin
[ 802.729824] spi_imx 30830000.spi: mx51_ecspi_prepare_transfer: count=127, bits_per_word=8
-> transmitted 504 Bytes on the line
then I run it with burst disabled
spidev_test --device /dev/spidev1.0 --speed 20000000 --bpw 8 -i 127bytes-spi-test-data.bin -o 127bytes-spi-test-result.bin
[ 316.683807] spi_imx 30830000.spi: mx51_ecspi_prepare_transfer: count=0, bits_per_word=8
-> transmitted 127 Bytes on the line
The count is different
- for burst-enabled 127
- for burst-disable 0
concerning the sdma-firmware I checked on
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/imx/sdma
but the latest I found was 4.5
Regards
Stefan
Am 2023-11-20T16:30:15.000+01:00 hat Stefan Moring <stefan.moring@...hnolution.nl> geschrieben:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I have been trying to reproduce your error on my iMX8M, scoping the SPI
> lines, but everything works as expected. I don't have the exact same board,
> but I don't think that should be a problem. One difference I noticed is
> that my imx-sdma firmware is version 4.6.
>
> Can you verify the values used for the transfer, spi_imx->count and
> spi_imx->bits_per_word inside the mx51_ecpsi_prepare_transfer() method?
> Those are the only two things that changed in the commits. Maybe compare
> them to the working version?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Stefan Moring
>
> Op ma 20 nov 2023 om 11:18 schreef Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>:
>
>
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 10:33:38AM +0100, linux@...ler.io wrote:
> >
> > > I run the test and it worked fine. The transmitted data matches with
> > > the recived data, no diff.
> > ok, thanks for confirming. At least we are on the same page.
> >
> >
> > > BUT!!! on the MDIO it is completly different !!!
> > > When I request to send 4kB Data I measure on the line 16384Byte.
> > >
> > > The data is again 3Dummy Bytes followed by the databyte.
> > > So the error symetic on send and recive
> >
> > ok, that's annoying. I wonder if the loopback test could be improved to
> > spot such kind of issues, maybe we could verify if the execution time
> > is reasonable given the SPI clock frequency and the payload size ...
> >
> > Francesco
> >
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists