[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgAPxyNxMTz-uoPExcg4e1h5iXCuR5ZOy7UUt5gjbd2VA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 10:21:36 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf/core: Update perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context()
Hi Mingwei,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 3:24 PM Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 2:19 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > It was unnecessarily disabling and enabling PMUs for each event. It
> > > should be done at PMU level. Add pmu_ctx->nr_freq counter to check it
> > > at each PMU. As pmu context has separate active lists for pinned group
> > > and flexible group, factor out a new function to do the job.
> > >
> > > Another minor optimization is that it can skip PMUs w/ CAP_NO_INTERRUPT
> > > even if it needs to unthrottle sampling events.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> >
> > Series:
> > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ian
> >
>
> Can we have "Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org" for the whole series? This
> series should have a great performance improvement for all VMs in which
> perf sampling events without specifying period.
I was not sure if it's ok to have this performance fix in the stable series.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists