[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZV0_8oOaHarW4rMQ@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:40:34 -0800
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Radu Pirea <radu-nicolae.pirea@....nxp.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 15/16] net: ethtool: ts: Let the active time
stamping layer be selectable
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 06:31:14PM +0100, Köry Maincent wrote:
> If I summarize, a solution could be this:
>
> - Expand struct hwtstamp_config with a phc_index member for the SIOCG/SHWTSTAMP
> commands.
> To keep backward compatibility if phc_index is not set in the hwtstamp_config
> data from userspace use the default hwtstamp (the default being selected as
> done in my patch series).
> Is this possible, would it breaks things?
You can't "expand" hwtstamp_config because it is an established ABI.
(You could introduce SIOC[GS]HWTSTAMP_2 with an expanded layout)
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists