linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/24] mm/swap: check readahead policy per entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF8kJuOP_7Z+av6p260oj4BEO=5W0246LWfc_dx8iKc8o3NU6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2023 21:20:29 -0800
From:   Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>
To:     "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:     Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/24] mm/swap: check readahead policy per entry

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 5:12 PM Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
> > but this series is growing too long so I thought it will be better
> > done later.
>
> You don't need to keep everything in one series.  Just use multiple
> series.  Even if they are all swap-related.  They are dealing with
> different problem in fact.

I second that. Actually having multiple smaller series is *preferred*
over one long series.
Shorter series are easier to review.

Chris