linux-kernel - Re: [rft, PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: Remove unused member in struct lpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c622c2a5-665f-4ee3-b3dd-fafb3adf6191@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2023 08:14:09 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: Remove unused
 member in struct lpi_pingroup

On 20/11/2023 20:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The group is not used anywhere, remove it. And if needed, it should be
> struct pingroup anyway.
> 
> While at it, replace kernel.h with what exactly being used.

Missing Reported-by and Closes by for LKP... Unless you discovered it
without its report?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> 
> _Seems_ like this (I only read the code), hence rft.
> 
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h      |  6 +----
>  .../pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sc7280-lpass-lpi.c   | 16 -------------
>  .../pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sc8280xp-lpass-lpi.c | 20 ----------------
>  .../pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm6115-lpass-lpi.c   | 20 ----------------
>  .../pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8250-lpass-lpi.c   | 15 ------------
>  .../pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8350-lpass-lpi.c   | 16 -------------
>  .../pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8450-lpass-lpi.c   | 24 -------------------

Missing sm8550.

>  7 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 116 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h
> index 206b2c0ca828..a9b2f65c1ebe 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h
> @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
>  #ifndef __PINCTRL_LPASS_LPI_H__
>  #define __PINCTRL_LPASS_LPI_H__
>  
> +#include <linux/array_size.h>
>  #include <linux/bits.h>
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
>  
>  #include "../core.h"
>  
> @@ -45,11 +45,8 @@ struct pinctrl_pin_desc;
>  
>  #define LPI_PINGROUP(id, soff, f1, f2, f3, f4)		\
>  	{						\
> -		.group.name = "gpio" #id,			\
> -		.group.pins = gpio##id##_pins,		\

Aren't these used by core pinctrl code?

Best regards,
Krzysztof