lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2023 10:04:45 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Corentin LABBE <clabbe@...libre.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, heiko@...ech.de, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de, robh+dt@...nel.org, sboyd@...nel.org,
        ricardo@...dini.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: crypto: add support for
 rockchip,crypto-rk3588

On 20/11/2023 13:37, Corentin LABBE wrote:

>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/rockchip,rk3588-crypto.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/rockchip,rk3588-crypto.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..07024cf4fb0e
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/rockchip,rk3588-crypto.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/crypto/rockchip,rk3588-crypto.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Rockchip cryptographic offloader V2
>>
>> v2? Where is any documentation of this versioning? From where does it
>> come from?
>>
> 
> Hello
> 
> Datasheet/TRM has no naming or codename.
> But vendor source call it crypto v2, so I kept the name.

I would suggest using information from datasheet/manual or just SoC
name, so:

Rockchip RK3588 Cryptographic Offloader

How can you be sure that downstream source used v2 for hardware, not
driver? Poor-quality downstream source is rarely a source of proper
solution...



Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists