linux-kernel - Re: [rft, PATCH v4 00/16] drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2023 12:28:37 +0200
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 00/16] drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of
 IOSF GPIO

On Fri, 17 Nov 2023, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>> > Ok, this now has been testen on both a BYT and a CHT device which
>> > actually use GPIO controls in their MIPI sequences so this
>> > series is:
>> >
>> > Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>> >
>> > And the code of the entire series also looks good to me:
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>> >
>> > for the series.
>> 
>> Thanks Andy & Hans!
>> 
>> I'll merge this once the test results are in. The BAT results have been
>> a bit flaky recently, so needed to do a rerun.
>> 
>> That said, I'm not sure if we have any hardware in CI that would
>> actually exercise the modifications, so in that sense I trust Hans'
>> testing much more.
>
> Thank you!
> Should I fix checkpatch warnings CI reported about?

Nah, they're benign.

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel