linux-kernel - [REPOST PATCH] srcu: Use try-lock lockdep annotation for NMI-safe access.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231121123315.egrgopGN@linutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:33:15 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
Subject: [REPOST PATCH] srcu: Use try-lock lockdep annotation for NMI-safe
 access.

It is claimed that srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() NMI-safe. However it
triggers a lockdep if used from NMI because lockdep expects a deadlock
since nothing disables NMIs while the lock is acquired.

Use a try-lock annotation for srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() to avoid lockdep
complains if used from NMI.

Fixes: f0f44752f5f61 ("rcu: Annotate SRCU's update-side lockdep dependencies")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230927160231.XRCDDSK4@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---

This is a repost of
	https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230927160231.XRCDDSK4@linutronix.de

Based on the discussion there I *think* this is preferred over the NMI
check in lock_acquire().
But then PeterZ also pointed out that he has a problem with
	f0f44752f5f61 ("rcu: Annotate SRCU's update-side lockdep dependencies")

because trace_.*_rcuidle machinery. This looks okay because the _rcuidle
part is using SRCU and the rcu_dereference_raw() tracepoint_func is
using RCU + SRCU in its free part.

 include/linux/rcupdate.h |    6 ++++++
 include/linux/srcu.h     |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -301,6 +301,11 @@ static inline void rcu_lock_acquire(stru
 	lock_acquire(map, 0, 0, 2, 0, NULL, _THIS_IP_);
 }
 
+static inline void rcu_try_lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *map)
+{
+	lock_acquire(map, 0, 1, 2, 0, NULL, _THIS_IP_);
+}
+
 static inline void rcu_lock_release(struct lockdep_map *map)
 {
 	lock_release(map, _THIS_IP_);
@@ -315,6 +320,7 @@ int rcu_read_lock_any_held(void);
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
 
 # define rcu_lock_acquire(a)		do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_try_lock_acquire(a)	do { } while (0)
 # define rcu_lock_release(a)		do { } while (0)
 
 static inline int rcu_read_lock_held(void)
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_nmisafe
 
 	srcu_check_nmi_safety(ssp, true);
 	retval = __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(ssp);
-	rcu_lock_acquire(&ssp->dep_map);
+	rcu_try_lock_acquire(&ssp->dep_map);
 	return retval;
 }