[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231121115457.76269-2-cloudliang@tencent.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 19:54:49 +0800
From: Jinrong Liang <ljr.kernel@...il.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@...gle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@...cent.com>,
Jinrong Liang <ljr.kernel@...il.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] KVM: selftests: Add forced emulation check to fix #UD
Forced emulation uses a magic "prefix" to trigger a #UD, which KVM
intercepts. If forced emulation isn't enabled, KVM ignores the magic
prefix and reflects the #UD back into the guest.
Reported-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@...cent.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@...cent.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c | 41 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
index 248ebe8c0577..7d8094a27209 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
@@ -325,6 +325,26 @@ __GUEST_ASSERT(expect_gp ? vector == GP_VECTOR : !vector, \
"Expected " #insn "(0x%x) to yield 0x%lx, got 0x%lx", \
msr, expected_val, val);
+static void guest_test_rdpmc(uint32_t rdpmc_idx, bool expect_success,
+ uint64_t expected_val)
+{
+ uint8_t vector;
+ uint64_t val;
+
+ vector = rdpmc_safe(rdpmc_idx, &val);
+ GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(RDPMC, rdpmc_idx, !expect_success, vector);
+ if (expect_success)
+ GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_VALUE(RDPMC, rdpmc_idx, val, expected_val);
+
+ if (!is_forced_emulation_enabled)
+ return;
+
+ vector = rdpmc_safe_fep(rdpmc_idx, &val);
+ GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(RDPMC, rdpmc_idx, !expect_success, vector);
+ if (expect_success)
+ GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_VALUE(RDPMC, rdpmc_idx, val, expected_val);
+}
+
static void guest_rd_wr_counters(uint32_t base_msr, uint8_t nr_possible_counters,
uint8_t nr_counters, uint32_t or_mask)
{
@@ -367,20 +387,15 @@ static void guest_rd_wr_counters(uint32_t base_msr, uint8_t nr_possible_counters
if (!expect_gp)
GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_VALUE(RDMSR, msr, val, expected_val);
+ /*
+ * Redo the read tests with RDPMC, which has different indexing
+ * semantics and additional capabilities.
+ */
rdpmc_idx = i;
if (base_msr == MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0)
rdpmc_idx |= INTEL_RDPMC_FIXED;
- /* Redo the read tests with RDPMC, and with forced emulation. */
- vector = rdpmc_safe(rdpmc_idx, &val);
- GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(RDPMC, rdpmc_idx, !expect_success, vector);
- if (expect_success)
- GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_VALUE(RDPMC, rdpmc_idx, val, expected_val);
-
- vector = rdpmc_safe_fep(rdpmc_idx, &val);
- GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(RDPMC, rdpmc_idx, !expect_success, vector);
- if (expect_success)
- GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_VALUE(RDPMC, rdpmc_idx, val, expected_val);
+ guest_test_rdpmc(rdpmc_idx, expect_success, expected_val);
/*
* KVM doesn't support non-architectural PMUs, i.e. it should
@@ -390,11 +405,7 @@ static void guest_rd_wr_counters(uint32_t base_msr, uint8_t nr_possible_counters
GUEST_ASSERT(!expect_success || !pmu_has_fast_mode);
rdpmc_idx |= INTEL_RDPMC_FAST;
- vector = rdpmc_safe(rdpmc_idx, &val);
- GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(RDPMC, rdpmc_idx, true, vector);
-
- vector = rdpmc_safe_fep(rdpmc_idx, &val);
- GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(RDPMC, rdpmc_idx, true, vector);
+ guest_test_rdpmc(rdpmc_idx, false, -1ull);
vector = wrmsr_safe(msr, 0);
GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(WRMSR, msr, expect_gp, vector);
--
2.39.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists