[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43376552-7e79-4f34-94ca-63767a95564b@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:06:13 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] dt-bindings: clock: ipq5332: drop the few nss
clocks definition
On 21/11/2023 15:30, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
> In commit 0dd3f263c810 ("clk: qcom: ipq5332: enable few nssnoc clocks in
Where is this commit coming from?
> driver probe"), gcc_snoc_nssnoc_clk, gcc_snoc_nssnoc_1_clk,
> gcc_nssnoc_nsscc_clk are enabled in driver probe to keep it always-on.
Implementation can change and for example bring back these clocks. Are
you going to change bindings? No, drop the patch.
Bindings should be dropped only in a few rare cases like clocks not
available for OS or bugs.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists