lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a52cedc-ca72-4237-b038-f0cfd0db8b29@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2023 08:29:21 -0700
From:   Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC:     <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        <lenb@...nel.org>, <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        <guohanjun@...wei.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
        <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <cfsworks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix ARM32 platforms compile issue introduced by
 fw_table changes



On 11/22/23 06:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 11:19 PM Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> Linus reported that:
>> After commit a103f46633fd the kernel stopped compiling for
>> several ARM32 platforms that I am building with a bare metal
>> compiler. Bare metal compilers (arm-none-eabi-) don't
>> define __linux__.
>>
>> This is because the header <acpi/platform/acenv.h> is now
>> in the include path for <linux/irq.h>:
>>
>>   CC      arch/arm/kernel/irq.o
>>   CC      kernel/sysctl.o
>>   CC      crypto/api.o
>> In file included from ../include/acpi/acpi.h:22,
>>                  from ../include/linux/fw_table.h:29,
>>                  from ../include/linux/acpi.h:18,
>>                  from ../include/linux/irqchip.h:14,
>>                  from ../arch/arm/kernel/irq.c:25:
>> ../include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:218:2: error: #error Unknown target environment
>>   218 | #error Unknown target environment
>>       |  ^~~~~
>>
>> The issue is caused by the introducing of splitting out the ACPI code to
>> support the new generic fw_table code.
>>
>> Rafael suggested [1] moving the fw_table.h include in linux/acpi.h to below
>> the linux/mutex.h. Remove the two includes in fw_table.h. Add include of
>> linux/acpi.h in fw_table.c before the fw_table.h include.
>>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/CAJZ5v0idWdJq3JSqQWLG5q+b+b=zkEdWR55rGYEoxh7R6N8kFQ@mail.gmail.com/
>> Fixes: a103f46633fd ("acpi: Move common tables helper functions to common lib")
>> Reported-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - Remove linux/acpi.h include as well in fw_table.h. (Sam)
>> ---
>>  include/linux/acpi.h     |   22 +++++++++++-----------
>>  include/linux/fw_table.h |    3 ---
>>  lib/fw_table.c           |    1 +
>>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
>> index 54189e0e5f41..4db54e928b36 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
>> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
>>  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>>  #include <linux/property.h>
>>  #include <linux/uuid.h>
>> -#include <linux/fw_table.h>
>>
>>  struct irq_domain;
>>  struct irq_domain_ops;
>> @@ -25,22 +24,13 @@ struct irq_domain_ops;
>>  #endif
>>  #include <acpi/acpi.h>
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_TABLE_LIB
>> -#define EXPORT_SYMBOL_ACPI_LIB(x) EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(x, ACPI)
>> -#define __init_or_acpilib
>> -#define __initdata_or_acpilib
>> -#else
>> -#define EXPORT_SYMBOL_ACPI_LIB(x)
>> -#define __init_or_acpilib __init
>> -#define __initdata_or_acpilib __initdata
>> -#endif
>> -
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>>
>>  #include <linux/list.h>
>>  #include <linux/dynamic_debug.h>
>>  #include <linux/module.h>
>>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/fw_table.h>
>>
>>  #include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
>>  #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
>> @@ -48,6 +38,16 @@ struct irq_domain_ops;
>>  #include <acpi/acpi_io.h>
>>  #include <asm/acpi.h>
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_TABLE_LIB
>> +#define EXPORT_SYMBOL_ACPI_LIB(x) EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(x, ACPI)
>> +#define __init_or_acpilib
>> +#define __initdata_or_acpilib
>> +#else
>> +#define EXPORT_SYMBOL_ACPI_LIB(x)
>> +#define __init_or_acpilib __init
>> +#define __initdata_or_acpilib __initdata
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  static inline acpi_handle acpi_device_handle(struct acpi_device *adev)
>>  {
>>         return adev ? adev->handle : NULL;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/fw_table.h b/include/linux/fw_table.h
>> index ff8fa58d5818..ca49947f0a77 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/fw_table.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/fw_table.h
>> @@ -25,9 +25,6 @@ struct acpi_subtable_proc {
>>         int count;
>>  };
>>
>> -#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> -#include <acpi/acpi.h>
>> -
>>  union acpi_subtable_headers {
>>         struct acpi_subtable_header common;
>>         struct acpi_hmat_structure hmat;
>> diff --git a/lib/fw_table.c b/lib/fw_table.c
>> index b51f30a28e47..c4831f3378be 100644
>> --- a/lib/fw_table.c
>> +++ b/lib/fw_table.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>   *  Copyright (C) 2023 Intel Corp.
>>   */
>>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>>  #include <linux/fw_table.h>
> 
> Because fw_table.h is included via acpi.h, do you still need to
> include it directly here?

No. I'll drop.

> 
>>  #include <linux/init.h>
>>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>
>>
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ