[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH0PR18MB473487A5D3872C9DC05D97F0C7BAA@PH0PR18MB4734.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 16:15:37 +0000
From: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@...vell.com>
To: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Haseeb Gani <hgani@...vell.com>,
Vimlesh Kumar <vimleshk@...vell.com>,
"egallen@...hat.com" <egallen@...hat.com>,
"mschmidt@...hat.com" <mschmidt@...hat.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"wizhao@...hat.com" <wizhao@...hat.com>,
"konguyen@...hat.com" <konguyen@...hat.com>,
Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@...vell.com>,
Sathesh B Edara <sedara@...vell.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH net-next v1] octeon_ep: get max rx packet length
from firmware
Hi Suman
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 10:13 AM
> To: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@...vell.com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Haseeb Gani <hgani@...vell.com>; Vimlesh Kumar
> <vimleshk@...vell.com>; egallen@...hat.com; mschmidt@...hat.com;
> pabeni@...hat.com; horms@...nel.org; kuba@...nel.org;
> davem@...emloft.net; wizhao@...hat.com; konguyen@...hat.com;
> Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@...vell.com>; Veerasenareddy Burru
> <vburru@...vell.com>; Sathesh B Edara <sedara@...vell.com>; Eric
> Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH net-next v1] octeon_ep: get max rx packet length
> from firmware
> >@@ -1346,8 +1347,15 @@ static int octep_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> >
> > netdev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG;
> > netdev->features |= netdev->hw_features;
> >+
> >+ max_rx_pktlen = octep_ctrl_net_get_mtu(octep_dev,
> >OCTEP_CTRL_NET_INVALID_VFID);
> >+ if (max_rx_pktlen < 0) {
> >+ dev_err(&octep_dev->pdev->dev,
> >+ "Failed to get max receive packet size; err = %d\n",
> >max_rx_pktlen);
> >+ goto register_dev_err;
> >+ }
> [Suman] Do we need to check if max_rx_pktlen <= OCTEP_MAX_MTU as
> well? If not, then this macro is not required further after the change?
I suppose we should check this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists