lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac4011c6-980f-483b-97e9-da0e1fd4ca61@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:19:37 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: dma: ti: k3-*: Add descriptions for
 register regions

On 22/11/2023 16:42, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> In preparation for introducing more register regions, add description
> for existing register regions so that its easier to map reg-names to
> that of SoC Documentations/TRMs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml  | 26 +++++++++++--------
>  .../devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-pktdma.yaml |  6 ++++-
>  .../devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-udma.yaml   |  5 +++-
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml
> index 4ca300a42a99..b5444800b036 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml
> @@ -35,14 +35,6 @@ properties:
>        - ti,am64-dmss-bcdma
>        - ti,j721s2-dmss-bcdma-csi
>  
> -  reg:
> -    minItems: 3
> -    maxItems: 5
> -
> -  reg-names:
> -    minItems: 3
> -    maxItems: 5

Why do you remove properties from top-level? You shouldn't. We expect
there to have widest constrains. This is not explained in commit msg and
really not justified looking at further diff hunks.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ