lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fbc51bf1-3c4f-4575-a148-65fcfee1a8fe@acm.org>
Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:51:27 -0800
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Bean Huo <beanhuo@...pp.de>, avri.altman@....com,
        alim.akhtar@...sung.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, mani@...nel.org, quic_cang@...cinc.com,
        quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com, beanhuo@...ron.com, thomas@...ch.de
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mikebi@...ron.com, lporzio@...ron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Add UFS RTC support

On 11/22/23 09:25, Bean Huo wrote:
> Given that the RTC has been a standard feature since UFS Spec 2.0, and qTimestamp was introduced
> in UFS Spec 4.0, the majority of UFS devices currently on the market rely on RTC. Therefore, it
> is advisable to continue supporting RTC in the Linux kernel. This ensures compatibility with the
> prevailing UFS device implementations and facilitates seamless integration with existing hardware.
> By maintaining support for RTC, we ensure broad compatibility and avoid potential issues arising
> from deviations in device specifications across different UFS versions.

Patch descriptions should be 75 characters wide. See also
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.

Thanks,

Bart.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ