linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZV3gMilp-vhSPxc9@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2023 13:04:18 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
Cc:     mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 04:24:01PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> Since we don't have runtime PM handles here, we should be using
> EXPORT_NS_GPL_DEV_SLEEP_PM_OPS() macro, so that the compiler can
> discard it in case CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n.

Obviously correct fix, I've pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko