[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231122235113.180132-5-kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 18:51:11 -0500
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org
Cc: boqun.feng@...il.com, longman@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] bcachefs: Use lock_class_is_held() for btree locking asserts
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
---
fs/bcachefs/btree_locking.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/btree_locking.c b/fs/bcachefs/btree_locking.c
index 308c891ad3ca..ef84b0423deb 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/btree_locking.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/btree_locking.c
@@ -16,10 +16,7 @@ void bch2_btree_lock_init(struct btree_bkey_cached_common *b,
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
void bch2_assert_btree_nodes_not_locked(void)
{
-#if 0
- //Re-enable when lock_class_is_held() is merged:
BUG_ON(lock_class_is_held(&bch2_btree_node_lock_key));
-#endif
}
#endif
--
2.42.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists