[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZV2dvlKYSDUu6Uit@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 06:20:46 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Zhiguo Jiang <justinjiang@...o.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC flag allocation issue
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 09:39:25AM +0800, Zhiguo Jiang wrote:
> Update base on the latest Linus' tree or Andrew's tree.
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2851,9 +2851,9 @@ struct page *__rmqueue_pcplist(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
> int alloced;
>
> /*
> - * If pcplist is empty and alloc_flags is with ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC,
> - * it should alloc from buddy highatomic migrate freelist firstly
> - * to ensure quick and successful allocation.
> + * If pcplist is empty and alloc_flags contains
> + * ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC, alloc from buddy highatomic
> + * freelist first.
No, it's still based on your earlier patch, is it really so hard for
you to read your patches before you send them?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists