[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZV2e/6qTJDkjYbfY@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 22:26:07 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: mhklinux@...look.com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, kys@...rosoft.com,
haiyangz@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
urezki@...il.com, hch@...radead.org, lstoakes@...il.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, ardb@...nel.org, jroedel@...e.de,
seanjc@...gle.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] x86/mm: Remove "static" from vmap_pages_range()
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 01:20:11PM -0800, mhkelley58@...il.com wrote:
> From: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
>
> The mm subsystem currently provides no mechanism to map memory pages
> to a specified virtual address range. A virtual address range can be
> allocated using get_vm_area(), but the only function available for
> mapping memory pages to a caller-specified address in that range is
> ioremap_page_range(), which is inappropriate for system memory.
>
> Fix this by allowing vmap_pages_range() to be used by callers outside
> of vmalloc.c.
I really do not want to expose vmap_pages_range. Please try to come up
with a good way to encapsulate your map at a certain address primitive
and implement it in vmalloc.c.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists