lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bdb4cd62-2d17-4d19-b429-1232ec863456@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2023 07:45:58 +0100
From:   Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/17] tty: move locking docs out of Returns for functions
 in tty.h

On 21. 11. 23, 10:48, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote:
> 
>> Both tty_kref_get() and tty_get_baud_rate() note about locking in their
>> Return kernel-doc clause. Extract this info into a separate "Locking"
>> paragraph -- the same as we do for other tty functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@...nel.org>
>> Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/tty.h | 12 +++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/tty.h b/include/linux/tty.h
>> index 4b6340ac2af2..7625fc98fef3 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/tty.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/tty.h
...
>> @@ -436,10 +438,10 @@ void tty_encode_baud_rate(struct tty_struct *tty, speed_t ibaud,
>>    * tty_get_baud_rate - get tty bit rates
>>    * @tty: tty to query
>>    *
>> - * Returns: the baud rate as an integer for this terminal. The termios lock
>> - * must be held by the caller and the terminal bit flags may be updated.
>> + * Returns: the baud rate as an integer for this terminal
>>    *
>> - * Locking: none
>> + * Locking: The termios lock must be held by the caller and the terminal bit
>> + * flags may be updated.
> 
> I don't think the second part about the flags really belongs here, I'd
> keep it the description.

Any idea what does the part says in fact? I had not been thinking about 
the content and now I don't understand it.

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ