[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231122090210.951185-2-suhui@nfschina.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:02:12 +0800
From: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
To: pkshih@...ltek.com, kvalo@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, trix@...hat.com
Cc: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>, lizetao1@...wei.com,
linville@...driver.com, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH wireless-next 2/2] rtlwifi: rtl8821ae: phy: fix an undefined bitwise shift behavior
Clang staic checker warning:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/phy.c:184:49:
The result of the left shift is undefined due to shifting by '32',
which is greater or equal to the width of type 'u32'.
[core.UndefinedBinaryOperatorResult]
If the value of the right operand is negative or is greater than or
equal to the width of the promoted left operand, the behavior is
undefined.[1][2]
For example, when using different gcc's compilation optimizaation options
(-O0 or -O2), the result of '(u32)data << 32' is different. One is 0, the
other is old value of data. Adding an u64 cast to fix this problem.
[1]:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11270492/what-does-the-c-
standard-say-about-bitshifting-more-bits-than-the-width-of-type
[2]:https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf
Fixes: 21e4b0726dc6 ("rtlwifi: rtl8821ae: Move driver from staging to regular tree")
Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/phy.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/phy.c
index 6df270e29e66..89713e0587b5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/phy.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ u32 rtl8821ae_phy_query_bb_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 regaddr,
regaddr, bitmask);
originalvalue = rtl_read_dword(rtlpriv, regaddr);
bitshift = _rtl8821ae_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
- returnvalue = (originalvalue & bitmask) >> bitshift;
+ returnvalue = (u64)(originalvalue & bitmask) >> bitshift;
rtl_dbg(rtlpriv, COMP_RF, DBG_TRACE,
"BBR MASK=0x%x Addr[0x%x]=0x%x\n",
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ void rtl8821ae_phy_set_bb_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
originalvalue = rtl_read_dword(rtlpriv, regaddr);
bitshift = _rtl8821ae_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
data = ((originalvalue & (~bitmask)) |
- ((data << bitshift) & bitmask));
+ (((u64)data << bitshift) & bitmask));
}
rtl_write_dword(rtlpriv, regaddr, data);
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ u32 rtl8821ae_phy_query_rf_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
original_value = _rtl8821ae_phy_rf_serial_read(hw, rfpath, regaddr);
bitshift = _rtl8821ae_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
- readback_value = (original_value & bitmask) >> bitshift;
+ readback_value = (u64)(original_value & bitmask) >> bitshift;
spin_unlock(&rtlpriv->locks.rf_lock);
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ void rtl8821ae_phy_set_rf_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
original_value =
_rtl8821ae_phy_rf_serial_read(hw, rfpath, regaddr);
bitshift = _rtl8821ae_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
- data = ((original_value & (~bitmask)) | (data << bitshift));
+ data = ((original_value & (~bitmask)) | ((u64)data << bitshift));
}
_rtl8821ae_phy_rf_serial_write(hw, rfpath, regaddr, data);
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists