[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231122105401.11006-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 16:24:01 +0530
From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
To: mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro
Since we don't have runtime PM handles here, we should be using
EXPORT_NS_GPL_DEV_SLEEP_PM_OPS() macro, so that the compiler can
discard it in case CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n.
Fixes: b10a74b5c0c1 ("pinctrl: intel: Provide Intel pin control wide PM ops structure")
Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
index 2367c2747a83..d6f29e6faab7 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
@@ -1879,7 +1879,7 @@ static int intel_pinctrl_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
return 0;
}
-EXPORT_NS_GPL_DEV_PM_OPS(intel_pinctrl_pm_ops, PINCTRL_INTEL) = {
+EXPORT_NS_GPL_DEV_SLEEP_PM_OPS(intel_pinctrl_pm_ops, PINCTRL_INTEL) = {
NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(intel_pinctrl_suspend_noirq, intel_pinctrl_resume_noirq)
};
base-commit: c5860e4a2737a8b29dc426c800d01c5be6aad811
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists