[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a7695f7-e946-4e5f-8da1-a59ac7df7734@xen.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 13:04:18 +0000
From: Paul Durrant <xadimgnik@...il.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/15] KVM: pfncache: add a mark-dirty helper
On 22/11/2023 12:24, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 12:18 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>
>> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -1367,6 +1367,16 @@ int kvm_gpc_refresh(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, unsigned long len);
>> */
>> void kvm_gpc_deactivate(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * kvm_gpc_mark_dirty - mark a cached page as dirty.
>> + *
>> + * @gpc: struct gfn_to_pfn_cache object.
>> + */
>> +static inline void kvm_gpc_mark_dirty(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc)
>> +{
>> + mark_page_dirty_in_slot(gpc->kvm, gpc->memslot, gpc->gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> +}
>
> This doesn't rescind my existing ack, but it's probably worth asserting
> that gpc->lock is held here?
Yes, a good idea. If a v10 is needed, I'll add it. Otherwise I can do it
as an incremental patch.
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists